Underwriters at LaConcorde v. Airtech Services, Inc.
This text of 493 So. 2d 428 (Underwriters at LaConcorde v. Airtech Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We granted review in this case because the decision below, Underwriters at LaConcorde v. Airtech Services, Inc., 468 So.2d 386 (Fla.3d DCA 1985), directly and expressly conflicts with A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. v. Suber Cattle Co., 416 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), Broward County v. Sattler, 400 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), and Fort Pierce Toyota, Inc. v. Wolf, 345 So.2d 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
Subsequent to the Third District’s decision in this case, we decided Argonaut Insurance Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985). That case is controlling. Accordingly, we quash the decision below with directions to remand the cause to the trial court for the calculation of pre-judgment interest for Underwriters’ out-of-pocket pecuniary loss.
We decline to expand review from the conflict question to the issues raised by [429]*429respondent which were the subject matter of the cross-appeal below.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
493 So. 2d 428, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 300, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underwriters-at-laconcorde-v-airtech-services-inc-fla-1986.