Underwriters at Interest at Lloyd's v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.

846 So. 2d 584, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147, 2003 WL 1969217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 2003·No. No. 3D02-1949·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Underwriters at Interest at Lloyds appeals a judgment entered following summary judgment. We reverse. The trial court erred in entering summary judgment as genuine issues of fact remain unresolved as to the proper construction of the pertinent contract provisions. Each side suggests that we construe the contract in accordance with its position. However, summary judgment is inappropriate where the contract at issue is susceptible of more than one reasonable construction. Birwelco-Montenay, Inc. v. Infilco Degremont, Inc., 827 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Accordingly, the language of the agreement is ambiguous and presents factual issues requiring reversal.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Underwriters at Interest at Lloyd's v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., 846 So. 2d 584, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6147, 2003 WL 1969217 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

846 So. 2d 584 (Underwriters at Interest at Lloyd's v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. State
846 So. 2d 584 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)