Underwood v. Warren

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Underwood v. Warren

21 F. 573, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2420

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

DecidedSeptember 17, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 21 F. 573 (Underwood v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Underwood v. Warren, 21 F. 573, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2420 (circtedmo 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Treat, J.

The bill alleges that the Underwood patent was issued to Underwood, Warren, and March, each one-third interest. It also avers sundry transactions between the respective parties, wliereby said Warren and March conveyed all their interest therein to plaintiff for full consideration. This court, at its last term, examined at length all of the points substantially involved,² and. held that the respective parties defendant were estopped from disputing the validity of plaintiff’s right.

The exceptions, without resort to verbal criticism, are directed to the question of estoppel, and, under the allegations of the bill and answer with respect thereto, the ruling of this court, in the light of authorities there cited, must prevail, and the exceptions be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treat, J.

The bill alleges that the Underwood patent was issued to Underwood, Warren, and March, each one-third interest. It also avers sundry transactions between the respective parties, wliereby said Warren and March conveyed all their interest therein to plaintiff for full consideration. This court, at its last term, examined at length all of the points substantially involved,² and. held that the respective parties defendant were estopped from disputing the validity of plaintiff’s right.

The exceptions, without resort to verbal criticism, are directed to the question of estoppel, and, under the allegations of the bill and answer with respect thereto, the ruling of this court, in the light of authorities there cited, must prevail, and the exceptions be sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F. 573, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underwood-v-warren-circtedmo-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack