Underwood v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Underwood v. State

77 Ga. App. 711

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 25, 1948

Docket32031

StatusPublished

This text of 77 Ga. App. 711 (Underwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Underwood v. State, 77 Ga. App. 711 (Ga. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

MacIntyre, P. J.

The ruling in Underwood v. State, ante, is controlling on the issues in the present case, and we can add nothing to what has been said in that decision on the subject. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial for any of the reasons assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Gardner and Townsend, JJ., concur. J. Boy Rowland, for plaintiff in error. W. W. Larsen, Solicitor-General, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, P. J.

The ruling in Underwood v. State, ante, is controlling on the issues in the present case, and we can add nothing to what has been said in that decision on the subject. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial for any of the reasons assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Gardner and Townsend, JJ., concur. J. Boy Rowland, for plaintiff in error. W. W. Larsen, Solicitor-General, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 Ga. App. 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underwood-v-state-gactapp-1948.