Underwood v. State
This text of 517 So. 2d 83 (Underwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Woodrow Underwood, Jr., appeals from the judgment and sentences for possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony, and the second-degree offense for sale of cocaine. We affirm Underwood’s conviction but remand the matter to the trial court for a clerical correction of the judgment to reflect the appropriate degree for each offense. Greenberg v. State, 513 So.2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The appellant need not be present for the entry of these corrections.
In all other respects, the judgment and sentences are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
517 So. 2d 83, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2921, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11639, 1987 WL 2881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underwood-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.