Underwood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Underwood v. State

517 So. 2d 83, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2921, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11639, 1987 WL 2881

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 1987·No. No. 86-1947·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Woodrow Underwood, Jr., appeals from the judgment and sentences for possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony, and the second-degree offense for sale of cocaine. We affirm Underwood’s conviction but remand the matter to the trial court for a clerical correction of the judgment to reflect the appropriate degree for each offense. Greenberg v. State, 513 So.2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The appellant need not be present for the entry of these corrections.

In all other respects, the judgment and sentences are affirmed.

DANAHY, C.J., and LEHAN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Woodrow Underwood, Jr., appeals from the judgment and sentences for possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony, and the second-degree offense for sale of cocaine. We affirm Underwood’s conviction but remand the matter to the trial court for a clerical correction of the judgment to reflect the appropriate degree for each offense. Greenberg v. State, 513 So.2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The appellant need not be present for the entry of these corrections.

In all other respects, the judgment and sentences are affirmed.

DANAHY, C.J., and LEHAN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Underwood v. State, 517 So. 2d 83, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2921, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11639, 1987 WL 2881 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

517 So. 2d 83 (Underwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related