Underwood v. Schulz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Underwood v. Schulz

130 N.Y.S. 158

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 130 N.Y.S. 158 (Underwood v. Schulz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Underwood v. Schulz, 130 N.Y.S. 158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Only one bill of costs should have been taxed in this action. Plaintiff sued for a breach of warranty alleged to have been made by the defendants in the sale of a steam launch, of which the defendants were the joint owners and both of whom signed the written contract of sale. The defendants were united in interest, and one could not have been sued without joining the other.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Only one bill of costs should have been taxed in this action. Plaintiff sued for a breach of warranty alleged to have been made by the defendants in the sale of a steam launch, of which the defendants were the joint owners and both of whom signed the written contract of sale. The defendants were united in interest, and one could not have been sued without joining the other.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 N.Y.S. 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underwood-v-schulz-nyappterm-1911.