Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Underwood v. RANGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

Underwood v. RANGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

159 S.E.2d 144, 116 Ga. App. 803, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 968
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 5, 1967·No. 43228·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Deen, Judge.

A complete failure to argue any enumeration of error, either orally or by brief, constitutes an abandonment of the ground and it will not be passed upon by this court. Wall v. Rhodes, 112 Ga. App. 572 (1) (145 SE2d 756); Pinyan v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 113 Ga. App. 130 (147 SE2d 452); Amusements of America v. Schatz, 114 Ga. App. 627 (1) (152 SE2d 607); American Ins. Co. v. Guest Printing Co., 114 Ga. App. 775 (3) (152 SE2d 794). The appellant here failed to insist upon any of the enumerations of error in this case either by brief or oral argument, for which reason the judgment- of the trial court is

Affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Underwood v. RANGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., 159 S.E.2d 144, 116 Ga. App. 803, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 968 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967).

159 S.E.2d 144 (Underwood v. RANGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brookhaven Supply Co. v. DeKalb County
216 S.E.2d 694 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Bruce v. Calhoun First National Bank
216 S.E.2d 622 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Hurst v. Stith Equipment Co.
210 S.E.2d 851 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Watts v. Mylius
184 S.E.2d 195 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
S. S. Kresge Co. v. Carty
169 S.E.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Hatley v. State
167 S.E.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Harris v. State
166 S.E.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)