Underwood v. Fosha

Supreme Court of Kansas

Underwood v. Fosha

115 P. 979, 85 Kan. 191, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 36

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 10, 1911

DocketNo. 16,851

StatusPublished

This text of 115 P. 979 (Underwood v. Fosha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Underwood v. Fosha, 115 P. 979, 85 Kan. 191, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 36 (kan 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff had the right to disregard subsequent transfers and to allege a transfer by indorsement and delivery by the payee directly to him[192]*192self. The admission or the proof of subsequent transfers in fact in such a case does not constitute a variance. ‘

The plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to carry the question of the good faith of his purchase to the jury.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff had the right to disregard subsequent transfers and to allege a transfer by indorsement and delivery by the payee directly to him[192]*192self. The admission or the proof of subsequent transfers in fact in such a case does not constitute a variance. ‘

The plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to carry the question of the good faith of his purchase to the jury.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 P. 979, 85 Kan. 191, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underwood-v-fosha-kan-1911.