Underwood v. Beasley
Opinion
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case in which Beasley, the compensation claimant, seeks recovery for personal injury from appellant, R. W. Underwood. The material facts are not in dispute. It is admitted that Beasley was an employee of DeWitt Seay who was under contract with Underwood. The case turns on the question of whether or not Seay was an independent contractor or a sub-contractor of Underwood’s.
We have examined the record and we think Seay was an independent contractor. It follows that the case is controlled *829 by Gentile Bros. Co., v. Florida Industrial Commission, et al. 151 Fla. 857, 10 So. (2nd) 568, on authority of which the judgment must be and is hereby reversed.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
15 So. 2d 907 (Underwood v. Beasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.