Underwood v. Bailey

58 N.H. 59
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 N.H. 59 (Underwood v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Underwood v. Bailey, 58 N.H. 59 (N.H. 1876).

Opinion

Stanley, J.

The consequences of the error of the commissioners, in affirming the defective laying out, did not extend beyond the action of the commissioners in which the error occurred. It did not reach back to the prior proceedings. The error complained of is therefore fully rectified, and the grievance complained of fully redressed, by setting aside the report, leaving the appeal to be proceeded with as if no *60 hearing had been had and no report made. Hayward v. Bath, 35 N. H. 514. The setting aside of the report was like the setting aside of a verdict for error, winch may be obviated by another trial.

Exception overruled.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bickford v. Franconia
60 A. 98 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.H. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underwood-v-bailey-nh-1876.