Underhill v. Van Cortlandt

New York Court of Chancery

Underhill v. Van Cortlandt

1 Johns. Ch. 500, 1815 N.Y. LEXIS 164, 1815 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 38

DecidedAugust 14, 1815

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Johns. Ch. 500 (Underhill v. Van Cortlandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Underhill v. Van Cortlandt, 1 Johns. Ch. 500, 1815 N.Y. LEXIS 164, 1815 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 38 (N.Y. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The motion to enlarge -publication is not of course, but the circumstances of delay are not sufficiently strong to induce a refusal of it, altogether, in this case. To enlarge the rule for publication, only until the present plaintiffs shall have sufficiently answered the cross-bill, puts it in their power to put an end to the delay, at any time, and to bring on their cause to a hearing.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The motion to enlarge -publication is not of course, but the circumstances of delay are not sufficiently strong to induce a refusal of it, altogether, in this case. To enlarge the rule for publication, only until the present plaintiffs shall have sufficiently answered the cross-bill, puts it in their power to put an end to the delay, at any time, and to bring on their cause to a hearing.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Johns. Ch. 500, 1815 N.Y. LEXIS 164, 1815 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underhill-v-van-cortlandt-nychanct-1815.