Underhill v. State
915 So. 2d 269, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19597, 2005 WL 3299360
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 2005·No. No. 4D02-3091·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
REVISED OPINION
On the court’s own motion we withdraw our previously filed opinion in this case and, based on the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86, 2005 WL 2155200 (Fla. Sept. 8, 2005), find that appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a habitual felony offender is without merit. We therefore affirm his conviction and sentence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Underhill v. State, 915 So. 2d 269, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19597, 2005 WL 3299360 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
915 So. 2d 269 (Underhill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kennedy v. State
915 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)