Underhill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Underhill v. State

915 So. 2d 269, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19597, 2005 WL 3299360

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 7, 2005

DocketNo. 4D02-3091

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 915 So. 2d 269 (Underhill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Underhill v. State, 915 So. 2d 269, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19597, 2005 WL 3299360 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

REVISED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On the court’s own motion we withdraw our previously filed opinion in this case and, based on the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86, 2005 WL 2155200 (Fla. Sept. 8, 2005), find that appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a habitual felony offender is without merit. We therefore affirm his conviction and sentence.

Affirmed.

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI