Underhill v. Muskegon Booming Co.

40 Mich. 660, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 656
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 1879·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Cooley, J.

The controversy in this case concerns the right to stop in transit certain logs sold by plaintiffs [662] to tbe copartnership of E. Eldred & Co., and which, came to the control of the defendants in the Muskegon river.

The logs were sold by two different contracts in writing, one of which it is conceded was fully performed, and the logs delivered under it. A copy of the other is given in the margin.

Footnotes

Underhill v. Muskegon Booming Co., 40 Mich. 660, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 656 (Mich. 1879).

40 Mich. 660 (Underhill v. Muskegon Booming Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kingman & Co. v. Denison
11 L.R.A. 347 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
McLaughlin v. Marston
47 N.W. 1058 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1891)
Underhill v. Muskegon Booming Co.
8 N.W. 100 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)
Muskegon Booming Co. v. Underhill
5 N.W. 1073 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)