Underhill v. Muskegon Booming Co.

40 Mich. 660, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 656
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 24, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 40 Mich. 660 (Underhill v. Muskegon Booming Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Underhill v. Muskegon Booming Co., 40 Mich. 660, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 656 (Mich. 1879).

Opinion

Cooley, J.

The controversy in this case concerns the right to stop in transit certain logs sold by plaintiffs [662]*662to tbe copartnership of E. Eldred & Co., and which, came to the control of the defendants in the Muskegon river.

The logs were sold by two different contracts in writing, one of which it is conceded was fully performed, and the logs delivered under it. A copy of the other is given in the margin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kingman & Co. v. Denison
11 L.R.A. 347 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1891)
McLaughlin v. Marston
47 N.W. 1058 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1891)
Underhill v. Muskegon Booming Co.
8 N.W. 100 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)
Muskegon Booming Co. v. Underhill
5 N.W. 1073 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Mich. 660, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/underhill-v-muskegon-booming-co-mich-1879.