Undercofler v. Colonial Stores, Inc.

154 S.E.2d 464, 115 Ga. App. 332, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1098
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Undercofler v. Colonial Stores, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 Ga. App. 466
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 2, 1967·No. 42272·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Supreme Court (in Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Undercofler, 223 Ga. 105 (153 SE2d 549)) having reversed our judgment in Undercofler v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 114 Ga. App. 466 (151 SE2d 794), the judgment is hereby vacated, [333] and in accordance with the judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court the judgment of the trial court is

Bell, P. J., Jordan and Eberhardt, JJ., concur. Decided March 2, 1967. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, William L. Harper, Louis F. McDonald, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant. Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers, McClatchey & Regenstein, George B. Haley, Jr., G. Kimbrough Taylor, Jr., for appellee.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Undercofler v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 154 S.E.2d 464, 115 Ga. App. 332, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1098 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967).

154 S.E.2d 464 (Undercofler v. Colonial Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Undercofler
153 S.E.2d 549 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Undercofler v. Colonial Stores, Inc.
151 S.E.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)