Under Seal v. Under Seal

Fourth Circuit

Under Seal v. Under Seal

369 F. App'x 487

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2010·No. No. 09-1970·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their various motions for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Under Seal v. Under Seal, No. 3:09-cv-00028-JPB (N.D.W.Va. July 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their various motions for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Under Seal v. Under Seal, No. 3:09-cv-00028-JPB (N.D.W.Va. July 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Under Seal v. Under Seal, 369 F. App'x 487 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

369 F. App'x 487 (Under Seal v. Under Seal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.