Under Seal v. Under Seal
Opinion
Appellant appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on a complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Under Seal v. Under Seal, No. CA-04-230 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
132 F. App'x 438 (Under Seal v. Under Seal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.