Uncle Henry's, Inc. v. Plaut Consulting, Inc.

278 F. Supp. 2d 53, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14880, 2003 WL 22012594
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Uncle Henry's, Inc. v. Plaut Consulting, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 240 F. Supp. 2d 63
District Court, D. Maine·Decided August 14, 2003·No. CIV. 01-180-B-H·Published

Opinion

ORDER ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

HORNBY, District Judge.

The defendant’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or in the alternative to alter or amend judgment (Docket No. 169), the plaintiffs renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (Docket No. 171), and the plaintiffs motion for a new trial (Docket No. 170) are Denied. The plaintiffs motion to alter or amend judgment (Docket No. 172) is Denied in Part in so far as the plaintiff requests relief from this Court’s prior summary judgment ruling. All of these issues have been briefed or argued abundantly already. The defendant has until August 20, 2003 to respond to the remaining portion of the plaintiffs motion to alter the judgment concerning pre- and post-judgment interest.

So Ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uncle Henry's, Inc. v. Plaut Consulting, Inc., 278 F. Supp. 2d 53, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14880, 2003 WL 22012594 (D. Me. 2003).

278 F. Supp. 2d 53 (Uncle Henry's, Inc. v. Plaut Consulting, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.