Unclaimed Freight, Inc. v. Atlantic Distributors, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Unclaimed Freight, Inc. v. Atlantic Distributors, Inc.

282 So. 2d 196

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 7, 1973

DocketNo. 73-26

StatusPublished

This text of 282 So. 2d 196 (Unclaimed Freight, Inc. v. Atlantic Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Unclaimed Freight, Inc. v. Atlantic Distributors, Inc., 282 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and on the basis thereof we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. Spalding v. Von Zamft, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 208; Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 446; Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 480; James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Company, Fla.App. 1970, 238 So.2d 487. We further find that the appellants’ assignments of error and brief have failed to comply with Florida Appellate Rules 3.5, subd. c and 3.7, subd. f(4), 32 F.S.A. See Redditt v. State, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 317; Miami Investors Syndicate v. Johnnie & Mack, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 617; Local Lodge Number 1248, etc. v. St. Regis Paper Co., Fla.App.1960, 125 So.2d 337; Sirmons v. Pittman, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 765.

Affirmed. *

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and on the basis thereof we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. Spalding v. Von Zamft, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 208; Stolley & Associates, Inc. v. Lawrence, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 446; Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 480; James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Company, Fla.App. 1970, 238 So.2d 487. We further find that the appellants’ assignments of error and brief have failed to comply with Florida Appellate Rules 3.5, subd. c and 3.7, subd. f(4), 32 F.S.A. See Redditt v. State, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 317; Miami Investors Syndicate v. Johnnie & Mack, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 617; Local Lodge Number 1248, etc. v. St. Regis Paper Co., Fla.App.1960, 125 So.2d 337; Sirmons v. Pittman, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 765.

Affirmed. *

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 So. 2d 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unclaimed-freight-inc-v-atlantic-distributors-inc-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack