Uncapher v. Curl
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 251
This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 251 (Uncapher v. Curl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Uncapher v. Curl, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 251 (Ohio 1927).
Opinion
It is contended in the Supreme Court that there is no statutory liability upon county commissioners for damage to abutting owners, when same is taken for highway widening, but. that the only remedy lies in injunction.
Note — Motion to certify allowed, 5 Abs. 154.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uncapher-v-curl-ohio-1927.