UNC Support Service/Burnside Ott & ITT-Hartford & Specialty Risk Services v. Hubbs

691 So. 2d 47, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3237, 1997 WL 163169
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1997·No. No. 96-3456·Published

Opinion

PER curiam:.

Appellants made late payment of the settlement due pursuant to the parties’ stipulation. According to the terms of the settlement agreement, appellants had 30 days from the date of the entry of the order approving the agreement to pay the amount due, and appellants did not make such payment -within 30 days. Therefore, although the judge of compensation claims erroneously extended the 30-day period by five days pursuant to Rule 4.030(c), Florida Rules of Workers’ Compensation Procedure, the judge properly assessed a 20 percent penalty under section 440.20(7), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). See Ocala Geriatric Ctr. v. Davis, 684 So.2d 228 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., and KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNC Support Service/Burnside Ott & ITT-Hartford & Specialty Risk Services v. Hubbs, 691 So. 2d 47, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3237, 1997 WL 163169 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

691 So. 2d 47 (UNC Support Service/Burnside Ott & ITT-Hartford & Specialty Risk Services v. Hubbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ocala Geriatric Center v. Davis
684 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)