Unangst v. Fitler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Unangst v. Fitler

84 Pa. 135, 1877 Pa. LEXIS 137

DecidedMarch 26, 1877

StatusPublished

This text of 84 Pa. 135 (Unangst v. Fitler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Unangst v. Fitler, 84 Pa. 135, 1877 Pa. LEXIS 137 (Pa. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered,

Per Curiam.

When one goes upon a note or bond with a married woman, whether as a principal or a surety, he is the only party bound. When Mrs. Wessner’s name was stricken out of the judgment, which was irregularly confessed against her, Unangst stood where he was before and at the time of the execution of the single bill, and his being a surety made no difference in' his liability. We perceive no error in striking out her name.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered,

Per Curiam.

When one goes upon a note or bond with a married woman, whether as a principal or a surety, he is the only party bound. When Mrs. Wessner’s name was stricken out of the judgment, which was irregularly confessed against her, Unangst stood where he was before and at the time of the execution of the single bill, and his being a surety made no difference in' his liability. We perceive no error in striking out her name.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 Pa. 135, 1877 Pa. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/unangst-v-fitler-pa-1877.