Umuzayire v. Ashcroft
This text of 79 F. App'x 651 (Umuzayire v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-Appellant Carine Liliane Umuzayire appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her declaratory-judgment action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Umuzayire argues that the district court had jurisdiction to review her asylum application.
Because Umuzayire is required to exhaust her administrative remedies by re *652 newing her request for asylum in the context of removal proceedings, the district court did not have jurisdiction over the present case. See Kashani v. Nelson, 793 F.2d 818, 826-27 (7th Cir.1986). As the district court lacked jurisdiction, we too lack jurisdiction and therefore must dismiss Umuzayire’s appeal.
AFFIRMED DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 F. App'x 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umuzayire-v-ashcroft-ca5-2003.