Umphreyville v. Gittins
This text of Umphreyville v. Gittins (Umphreyville v. Gittins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2241
KEVIN C. UMPHREYVILLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES W. GITTINS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00096-gec-bwc)
Submitted: February 10, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin C. Umphreyville, Appellant Pro Se. William Leonard Mitchell, II, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kevin C. Umphreyville appeals a district court order
granting summary judgment to Charles W. Gittins and dismissing
his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by
the district court. See Umphreyville v. Gittins, No. 5:07-cv-
00096-gec-bwc (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Umphreyville v. Gittins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umphreyville-v-gittins-ca4-2010.