Umlic-2 Finding Corp. v. Elshazly, No. Cv94 0138920 S (Nov. 9, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12520-T
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedNovember 9, 1995
DocketNo. CV94 0138920 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12520-T (Umlic-2 Finding Corp. v. Elshazly, No. Cv94 0138920 S (Nov. 9, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Umlic-2 Finding Corp. v. Elshazly, No. Cv94 0138920 S (Nov. 9, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12520-T (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION A judgment of strict foreclosure entered in this matter on January 17, 1995 and the court set May 23, 1995 as the law day for the defendants, Maria-Luise Elshazly, A/K/A Merlise Elshazly and Mahmoud Elshazly, owners of the equity of redemption. At the time of the entry of said judgment, the subject property was appraised at a value of $258,000.00 and the plaintiffs' debt was found to be $354,604.59 plus costs taxed at $838.50. Said defendants owners failed to redeem on their law day and all subsequent encumbrances also failed to redeem. Title to the subject premises vested in the plaintiff on May 25, 1995. On the basis of the foregoing valuation and the amount of the plaintiff's debt, the plaintiff has reason to believe that a deficiency exists in connection therewith.

"A valid assignment transfers to the assignee exclusive ownership of all the assignor's rights to the subject assigned and extinguishes all of those rights in the assignor." Mall v.LaBow, 33 Conn. App. 359, 362, 635 A.2d 871 (1993). Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to all of the rights acquired by its purchase of the note and mortgage, including a deficiency judgment. New England Savings Bank v. Andruschkevich, 8 CSCR 949,950 (August 13, 1993, Lager, J.). Accordingly, the amount paid by the plaintiff for the assignment is irrelevant to a determination of the rights assigned.

Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for deficiency judgment in the amount of $110,346.97 is granted.

HICKEY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New England Sav. Bank v. Andruschkevich, No. Cv-91-285341 (Aug. 13, 1993)
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 7263 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1993)
Mall v. LaBow
635 A.2d 871 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12520-T, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umlic-2-finding-corp-v-elshazly-no-cv94-0138920-s-nov-9-1995-connsuperct-1995.