Umlauf v. County of Chautauqua

166 A.D.2d 902

This text of 166 A.D.2d 902 (Umlauf v. County of Chautauqua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Umlauf v. County of Chautauqua, 166 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Rath, J.). We add only that Kircher v City of Jamestown (74 NY2d 251) does not apply to the facts of this case. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Rath, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kircher v. City of Jamestown
543 N.E.2d 443 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umlauf-v-county-of-chautauqua-nyappdiv-1990.