UMG Recordings, Inc. v. OpenDeal Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMay 11, 2022
Docket1:21-cv-09358
StatusUnknown

This text of UMG Recordings, Inc. v. OpenDeal Inc. (UMG Recordings, Inc. v. OpenDeal Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. OpenDeal Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: _ 5/11/2022

UMG RECORDINGS, INC. STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER v. Case No. 1:21-cv-09358 (AT) OPENDEAL INC. D/B/A REPUBLIC, Defendant.

WHEREAS, the parties to this action (collectively the “Parties” and each individually a “Party”’) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds good cause exists for the issuance of the within Protective Order, which the Court finds is appropriately tailored to govern the pretrial phase of this action. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Protective Order—including without limitation the Parties to this action (including their respective corporate parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, successors, and assigns), their attorneys, representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with notice of this Order who agree to be bound thereby—will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of appropriate sanction as the Court may determine: Designation and Use of Discovery Material 1. Counsel for a Party or for a third party which is providing or disclosing Discovery Material (as that term is hereinafter defined) in this action may designate any information of any

{F4613160.1 }

kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action, including, but not limited to, any document, information contained in a document, information revealed in an interrogatory response, and/or information revealed during a deposition (“Discovery Material”), as confidential if counsel determines, in good faith, that such designation is necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of the Party or third party represented by such counsel in

respect of Discovery Material that such Party or third party believes in good faith contains confidential and/or proprietary information not otherwise known or available to the public. 2. With respect to Discovery Material that a Party or third party designates as confidential or highly confidential pursuant to this Protective Order (“Confidential Discovery Material”), no person subject to this Protective Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material except as expressly permitted by and as provided in this Protective Order. 3. Where reasonably practicable and not unduly burdensome, the Party or third party producing or disclosing Discovery Material (“Producing Party”) shall designate as Confidential Discovery Material only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes

is necessary or appropriate to protect its interests and contains confidential and/or proprietary information not otherwise known or available to the public, including, but not limited to: (a) previously non-publicly-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, revenue projections and returns on investment, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, commissions, analyses, sales reports, and sale margins); (b) previously non-publicly-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company or entity; (c) previously non-publicly-disclosed business plans, potential investment opportunities, product development information, or marketing plans; (d) any information of a private or intimate nature regarding any individual; or (e) any other category of information that a Party reasonably believes in good

faith should be, or which the Court determines shall be, accorded confidential status. 4. The following information is not, and shall not be designated as, Confidential Discovery Material: any information that at the time of its disclosure in this action is part of the public domain or has been previously publicly disclosed through prior publication or other act that is not violative of this Protective Order; and any information that after its disclosure in this action becomes part of the public domain or is otherwise publicly disclosed by reason of its publication by a third party or other act that is not violative of this Protective Order. 5. Pursuant to and in accordance with Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d), the

production of Discovery Material in this litigation that is protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine, whether inadvertent or otherwise, shall not be a waiver of any privilege or protection from disclosure in this action or in any other legal proceedings. This Protective Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed under Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). 6. If at any time before the trial of this action a Producing Party realizes that it has inadvertently disclosed to the other Party or a third party (each a “Receiving Party”) Discovery Material which should have been marked as confidential, or is subject to the assertion by the Producing Party of the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, or some other recognized protection from disclosure, the Producing Party may so designate such material by giving written notice thereof to the Receiving Party or Receiving Parties of such material. As it relates to inadvertently disclosed Discovery Material that is subject to the assertion of the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, or some other recognized protection from disclosure, upon receipt of such notice, such Receiving Party or Receiving Parties shall (1)

not use and shall immediately cease reviewing or using such information; (2) take reasonable steps to retrieve the Discovery Material from others to whom the Receiving Party disclosed such Discovery Material; (3) destroy or return to the Producing Party such Discovery Material and all copies thereof in existence within five (5) business days of its receipt of such notice; and (4) provide written confirmation to the Producing Party of such destruction and/or return within five (5) business days thereof. As it relates to Discovery Material that is now being designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential, upon receipt of such notice, the Receiving Party or Receiving Parties shall treat the same in accordance with this Protective Order and the Producing Party shall produce a new copy of the Discovery Material bearing the appropriate confidentiality

designation. The inadvertent production of any such Discovery Material shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any privilege or other protection from disclosure, and no Party or third party shall argue to the contrary. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to, or shall, restrict the ability of a Party or third party to challenge the designation of such Discovery Material as confidential or challenge the assertion of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product protection, or other protection from disclosure with respect thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. OpenDeal Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umg-recordings-inc-v-opendeal-inc-nysd-2022.