Umfreville v. Keeler

New York Supreme Court

Umfreville v. Keeler

3 Thomp. & Cook 795

DecidedApril 15, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Thomp. & Cook 795 (Umfreville v. Keeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Umfreville v. Keeler, 3 Thomp. & Cook 795 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The opinion holds that the order granted at the October term should be modified so that the referee be directed to take an account of the rents and profits of the premises of which plaintiff was dispossessed, since defendant took possession, on the ground that defendants have been in possession since the litigation commenced, which point was not considered by the court in the former argument.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

E. Darwin Smith, J.

The opinion holds that the order granted at the October term should be modified so that the referee be directed to take an account of the rents and profits of the premises of which plaintiff was dispossessed, since defendant took possession, on the ground that defendants have been in possession since the litigation commenced, which point was not considered by the court in the former argument.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Thomp. & Cook 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umfreville-v-keeler-nysupct-1874.