UMFLEET v. Rigdon

Missouri Court of Appeals

UMFLEET v. Rigdon

260 S.W.3d 440, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1090, 2008 WL 3843801

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 19, 2008·No. ED 90590·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Umfleet appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of John and Elizabeth Rigdon on Umfleet’s vicarious liability and direct negligence claims. We find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Umfleet appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of John and Elizabeth Rigdon on Umfleet’s vicarious liability and direct negligence claims. We find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

UMFLEET v. Rigdon, 260 S.W.3d 440, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1090, 2008 WL 3843801 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

260 S.W.3d 440 (UMFLEET v. Rigdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.