Umeze v. Fidelis Care New York
This text of 952 N.E.2d 1060 (Umeze v. Fidelis Care New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 granted unconditionally, and the certified question answered in the negative.
Supreme Court abused its discretion by declining to grant defendants’ motion to dismiss without condition. Plaintiff failed to establish a (1) justifiable excuse for his failure to timely file a note of issue and (2) meritorious cause of action (see CPLR 3216 [e]; see also Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499 [1997]).
*752 Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
952 N.E.2d 1060, 17 N.Y.3d 751, 929 N.Y.S.2d 67, 2011 NY Slip Op 4770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umeze-v-fidelis-care-new-york-ny-2011.