UMB Bank, N.A. v. Tupulua

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 27, 2026·No. SCWC-24-0000333·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 27-JUL-2026 07:49 AM Dkt. 9 OGAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

UMB BANK, N.A., NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, BUT SOLELY AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR LVS TITLE TRUST XIII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

SA TUPULUA; GLADYS ULU TUPULUA, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants,

and

CITI BANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.; NOHOKAI AT SEA COUNTRY, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC151000083)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Cataldo, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Pursuant to this court’s discretion set forth in

Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a), Petitioners’ Application

for Writ of Certiorari, filed on June 15, 2026, is hereby

accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 27, 2026.

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Lisa W. Cataldo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UMB Bank, N.A. v. Tupulua, (haw 2026).

UMB Bank, N.A. v. Tupulua (UMB Bank, N.A. v. Tupulua) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.