Umani v. Clad

Third Circuit

Umani v. Clad

98 F.2d 128, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3172

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 17, 1938

DocketNo. 6576

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 F.2d 128 (Umani v. Clad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Umani v. Clad, 98 F.2d 128, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3172 (3d Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the much litigated question of a Pennsylvania bailment lease and a conditional sales contract. Concededly, 'the written instrument here involved is in proper bailment form. It provided that the bailors would rent to the bailee goods valued at $3,207.50 for twelve months; $1,248.85 to be paid upon the execution of the agreement and $160 per month thereafter until the total is paid, and then, upon the payment of $1 by the bailee, the bailor would make, execute and deliver to the bailee a good and sufficient bill of sale. Such being the fact, the court below, sitting en banc, by a majority of three to one, held the transaction was a bailment.

Without discussing in detail the facts, all of which were set forth at length in the court’s opinion, which by reference thereto we avoid restating, we are of opinion that the court, supported as it is by General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Horton, 3 Cir., 85 F.2d 452, and Jacquard Knitting Machine Co. v. Vennell, 3 Cir., 59 F.2d 496, committed no error. Its decree is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This case concerns the much litigated question of a Pennsylvania bailment lease and a conditional sales contract. Concededly, 'the written instrument here involved is in proper bailment form. It provided that the bailors would rent to the bailee goods valued at $3,207.50 for twelve months; $1,248.85 to be paid upon the execution of the agreement and $160 per month thereafter until the total is paid, and then, upon the payment of $1 by the bailee, the bailor would make, execute and deliver to the bailee a good and sufficient bill of sale. Such being the fact, the court below, sitting en banc, by a majority of three to one, held the transaction was a bailment.

Without discussing in detail the facts, all of which were set forth at length in the court’s opinion, which by reference thereto we avoid restating, we are of opinion that the court, supported as it is by General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Horton, 3 Cir., 85 F.2d 452, and Jacquard Knitting Machine Co. v. Vennell, 3 Cir., 59 F.2d 496, committed no error. Its decree is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F.2d 128, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/umani-v-clad-ca3-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack