Uman v. Timpane
This text of 77 A.D.2d 620 (Uman v. Timpane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 26, 1980, which denied their motion to dismiss the action for lack of in personam jurisdiction. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted and [621]*621complaint dismissed (see Rush v Savchuk, 444 US 320; Erneta v Princeton Hosp., 49 NY2d 829, revg 66 AD2d 669; Morehouse v Volkswagen AG., 74 AD2d 164). Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 A.D.2d 620, 431 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uman-v-timpane-nyappdiv-1980.