Ultra Ortho Prods., Inc. v. Tate Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ultra Ortho Prods., Inc. v. Tate Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 2016

Docket2016 NYSlipOp 50384(U)

StatusPublished

This text of Ultra Ortho Prods., Inc. v. Tate Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (Ultra Ortho Prods., Inc. v. Tate Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ultra Ortho Prods., Inc. v. Tate Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Ultra Ortho Products, Inc. as Assignee of DANE TOOMER, Appellant,

against

Tate Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Barry A. Schwartz, J.), entered May 8, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

For the reasons stated in Palafox PT, P.C. as Assignee of Katherine Fermin v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51653[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is affirmed.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Elliot, JJ., concur.

Decision Date: March 17, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI