Ultimate Health Prods., Inc. v. Omni Indem. Co.
This text of Ultimate Health Prods., Inc. v. Omni Indem. Co. (Ultimate Health Prods., Inc. v. Omni Indem. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Omni Indemnity Company, Appellant.
Freiberg, Peck & Kang, LLP (Yilo J. Kang, Esq.), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC, for respondent, (no brief filed).
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), entered February 25, 2014. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court denying defendant's motion which sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had not issued an insurance policy covering the vehicle which was involved in the accident in question.
For the reasons stated in Tam Med. Supply Corp. v Omni Indem. Co.(48 Misc 3d 142[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51294[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]), the order is reversed and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA AND SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 11, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ultimate Health Prods., Inc. v. Omni Indem. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ultimate-health-prods-inc-v-omni-indem-co-nyappterm-2017.