Ulrich v. Shatkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ulrich v. Shatkin

93 A.D.2d 1000, 461 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17930

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.D.2d 1000 (Ulrich v. Shatkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ulrich v. Shatkin, 93 A.D.2d 1000, 461 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: It does not clearly appear from the face of the complaint whether the gravamen of the action is for breach of contract or malpractice. For this reason Special Term properly denied the motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 5). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: It does not clearly appear from the face of the complaint whether the gravamen of the action is for breach of contract or malpractice. For this reason Special Term properly denied the motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 5). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.2d 1000, 461 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ulrich-v-shatkin-nyappdiv-1983.