Ulrich v. Shatkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ulrich v. Shatkin

93 A.D.2d 1000, 461 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17930

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: It does not clearly appear from the face of the complaint whether the gravamen of the action is for breach of contract or malpractice. For this reason Special Term properly denied the motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 5). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: It does not clearly appear from the face of the complaint whether the gravamen of the action is for breach of contract or malpractice. For this reason Special Term properly denied the motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 5). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Ulrich v. Shatkin, 93 A.D.2d 1000, 461 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

93 A.D.2d 1000 (Ulrich v. Shatkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.