Ulram v. Local 362, Journeymen Barbers, C.

196 A. 739, 123 N.J. Eq. 231, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 650
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided January 26, 1938·Published

Opinion

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Kays, and reported in 122 N.J. Eq. 464. For affirmance — PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 232

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ulram v. Local 362, Journeymen Barbers, C., 196 A. 739, 123 N.J. Eq. 231, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 650 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).

196 A. 739 (Ulram v. Local 362, Journeymen Barbers, C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ulram v. Local 362, Journeymen Barbers, C.
194 A. 263 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)