Ulpierre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ulpierre v. State

581 So. 2d 258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6707, 1991 WL 116870

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1991

DocketNo. 91-645

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 581 So. 2d 258 (Ulpierre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ulpierre v. State, 581 So. 2d 258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6707, 1991 WL 116870 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to resolve any discrepancy in the scoresheet and not correcting the scoresheet to reflect the accurate score. See State v. Wright, 574 So.2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Wills v. State, 561 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We agree. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to the correct sentencing guideline scoresheet.

The sentence is vacated and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to resolve any discrepancy in the scoresheet and not correcting the scoresheet to reflect the accurate score. See State v. Wright, 574 So.2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Wills v. State, 561 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We agree. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to the correct sentencing guideline scoresheet.

The sentence is vacated and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

581 So. 2d 258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6707, 1991 WL 116870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ulpierre-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack