Ulpierre v. State

581 So. 2d 258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6707, 1991 WL 116870
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 1991·No. No. 91-645·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to resolve any discrepancy in the scoresheet and not correcting the scoresheet to reflect the accurate score. See State v. Wright, 574 So.2d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Wills v. State, 561 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We agree. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to the correct sentencing guideline scoresheet.

The sentence is vacated and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ulpierre v. State, 581 So. 2d 258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6707, 1991 WL 116870 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

581 So. 2d 258 (Ulpierre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fretwell v. State
586 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)