Ulmer v. State Highway Department of Georgia

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ulmer v. State Highway Department of Georgia

81 S.E.2d 514, 210 Ga. 513, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 368

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 12, 1954

Docket18524

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 81 S.E.2d 514 (Ulmer v. State Highway Department of Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ulmer v. State Highway Department of Georgia, 81 S.E.2d 514, 210 Ga. 513, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 368 (Ga. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Head, Justice.

In the present case, prior to a hearing by the assessors to fix the value of the property sought to be condemned for highway purposes, the County of Lowndes and the condemnee entered into a written contract, wherein it was agreed, in consideration of certain acts by the county, such as moving a house from the right-of-way, relocation of certain water lines, and other items, that the assessors might find only the value of the land and no amounts for consequential damages or consequential benefits. Subsequently an award was made by the assessors fixing the value of the land taken, and an appeal was entered. The condemnee seeks by an action for declaratory judgment to have a final judgment entered by the court for the value of the land as fixed by the assessors, on the theory that the contract converted the statutory condemnation into an arbitration under the Code, Chapter 7-2. She prayed that the appeal be stayed by injunction until the rights of the parties are determined. Held:

1. “A petition seeking a declaratory judgment is not per se an equitable action (Felton v. Chandler, 201 Ga. 347, 39 S. E. 2d 654), nor is it converted into an equitable action merely because the court may grant a temporaiy restraining order to ‘maintain the status’ pending an adjudication with ‘respect to rights, status and other legal relations.’ Declaratory Judgments Act (Ga. L. 1945, p. 137; Code, Ann. Supp., § 110-1102); Milwaukee Mechanics’ Insurance Co. v. Davis, 204 Ga. 67 (48 S. E. 2d 876); Findley v. City of Vidalia, 204 Ga. 279 (49 S. E. 2d 658).” Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Turner, 208 Ga. 782 (60 S. E. 2d 771).

2. The plaintiff in error sought a declaration of rights pursuant to a contract. Jurisdiction of the cause is not conferred on this court because she sought to restrain a trial of the appeal in the condemnation case until the prayers of her petition for a declaration of rights could be heard.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head, Justice.

In the present case, prior to a hearing by the assessors to fix the value of the property sought to be condemned for highway purposes, the County of Lowndes and the condemnee entered into a written contract, wherein it was agreed, in consideration of certain acts by the county, such as moving a house from the right-of-way, relocation of certain water lines, and other items, that the assessors might find only the value of the land and no amounts for consequential damages or consequential benefits. Subsequently an award was made by the assessors fixing the value of the land taken, and an appeal was entered. The condemnee seeks by an action for declaratory judgment to have a final judgment entered by the court for the value of the land as fixed by the assessors, on the theory that the contract converted the statutory condemnation into an arbitration under the Code, Chapter 7-2. She prayed that the appeal be stayed by injunction until the rights of the parties are determined. Held:

1. “A petition seeking a declaratory judgment is not per se an equitable action (Felton v. Chandler, 201 Ga. 347, 39 S. E. 2d 654), nor is it converted into an equitable action merely because the court may grant a temporaiy restraining order to ‘maintain the status’ pending an adjudication with ‘respect to rights, status and other legal relations.’ Declaratory Judgments Act (Ga. L. 1945, p. 137; Code, Ann. Supp., § 110-1102); Milwaukee Mechanics’ Insurance Co. v. Davis, 204 Ga. 67 (48 S. E. 2d 876); Findley v. City of Vidalia, 204 Ga. 279 (49 S. E. 2d 658).” Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Turner, 208 Ga. 782 (60 S. E. 2d 771).

2. The plaintiff in error sought a declaration of rights pursuant to a contract. Jurisdiction of the cause is not conferred on this court because she sought to restrain a trial of the appeal in the condemnation case until the prayers of her petition for a declaration of rights could be heard.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.E.2d 514, 210 Ga. 513, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ulmer-v-state-highway-department-of-georgia-ga-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack