Ulmer v. MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
738 N.W.2d 739, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2397, 2007 WL 2758171
This text of 738 N.W.2d 739 (Ulmer v. MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ulmer v. MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, 738 N.W.2d 739, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2397, 2007 WL 2758171 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Julian Ellsworth ULMER, Petitioner,
v.
MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
738 N.W.2d 739, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2397, 2007 WL 2758171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ulmer-v-michigan-court-of-appeals-mich-2007.