Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Ulman v. . MacE

Ulman v. . MacE

20 S.E. 166, 115 N.C. 24
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee, Cukiam::

His Honor was probably unaware of the unreported case of Jones v. Craigmiles, 114 N. C., 613, in which it was held that the property should be described.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ulman v. . MacE, 20 S.E. 166, 115 N.C. 24 (N.C. 1894).

20 S.E. 166 (Ulman v. . MacE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wade Ex Rel. Moore v. McLean Contracting Co.
62 S.E. 919 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Bazemore v. . Mountain
35 S.E. 542 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1900)