Ulman v. Langham
49 Ala. 265
This text of 49 Ala. 265 (Ulman v. Langham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ulman v. Langham, 49 Ala. 265 (Ala. 1873).
Opinion
B. F. SAFFOLD, J.
— A deposit with the clerk of five dollars and a half is too small a provision to be considered as . giving security for the costs of a suit in the Circuit Court; es[266]*266pecially, in view of the law authorizing the officers of the court to demand their fees immediately upon the performance of each separate service. Session Acts 1868, p. 636.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 Ala. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ulman-v-langham-ala-1873.