Ulma Milagro Serrano v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-02535-FMO-AS Document 25 Filed 11/28/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:149
JS-6 ULMA MILAGRO SERRANO, ) Case No. CV 22-2535 FMO (ASx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE CORPORATION et al, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, (Dkt. 24, Notice of Settlement), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown by no later than December 28, 2022, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). Dated this 28th day of November, 2022. /s/ Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ulma Milagro Serrano v. Costco Wholesale Corporation (Ulma Milagro Serrano v. Costco Wholesale Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.