Ullrich v. Bronx House Community Center

96 A.D.3d 582, 947 N.Y.S.2d 91

This text of 96 A.D.3d 582 (Ullrich v. Bronx House Community Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ullrich v. Bronx House Community Center, 96 A.D.3d 582, 947 N.Y.S.2d 91 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered January 12, 2012, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Dismissal of the complaint is warranted in this action where plaintiff was injured during a basketball game at defendants’ facility, when another player punched him in the jaw. Plaintiff and his father both testified that the assault was unprovoked, unanticipated, and that there was no warning of an impending assault. Thus, by plaintiffs own account, the assault occurred in such a short span of time that even the most intense supervision could not have prevented it (see e.g. Espino v New York City Bd. of Educ., 80 AD3d 496 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 709 [2011]).

Plaintiffs father testified that he observed a dispute on the basketball court involving the assailant and other club members two years earlier. However, plaintiff failed to show that the notice was sufficiently specific for defendants to have reasonably anticipated the assault upon plaintiff (see Kamara v City of New York, 93 AD3d 449, 450 [2012]). Defendants’ failure to terminate [583]*583the assailant’s club membership after the earlier incident was not the proximate cause of the assault, which was an intentional and unforeseeable act of a third party (see Sugarman v Equinox Holdings, Inc., 73 AD3d 654, 655 [2010]). Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Acosta, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sugarman v. Equinox Holdings, Inc.
73 A.D.3d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Espino v. New York City Board of Education
80 A.D.3d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Kamara v. City of New York
93 A.D.3d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.3d 582, 947 N.Y.S.2d 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ullrich-v-bronx-house-community-center-nyappdiv-2012.