Ullman v. Coppard

Fifth Circuit

Ullman v. Coppard

246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1333

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 12, 1917

DocketNo. 3077

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 246 F. 124 (Ullman v. Coppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ullman v. Coppard, 246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1333 (5th Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, District Judge.

The only question presented in this case is whether the judgment of the referee, disallowing, on the objections interposed by the trustee in bankruptcy, a claim against the bankrupt estate by plaintiff in error, on the ground that the creditor had received a preference, constituted res adjudicata on the question of preference, and was admissible in evidence in a subsequent suit by the trustee to recover the preference. The District Court affirmatively so ruled, and with this we concur.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, District Judge.

The only question presented in this case is whether the judgment of the referee, disallowing, on the objections interposed by the trustee in bankruptcy, a claim against the bankrupt estate by plaintiff in error, on the ground that the creditor had received a preference, constituted res adjudicata on the question of preference, and was admissible in evidence in a subsequent suit by the trustee to recover the preference. The District Court affirmatively so ruled, and with this we concur.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ullman-v-coppard-ca5-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack