Ullman v. Coppard
246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1333
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 12, 1917·No. No. 3077·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
The only question presented in this case is whether the judgment of the referee, disallowing, on the objections interposed by the trustee in bankruptcy, a claim against the bankrupt estate by plaintiff in error, on the ground that the creditor had received a preference, constituted res adjudicata on the question of preference, and was admissible in evidence in a subsequent suit by the trustee to recover the preference. The District Court affirmatively so ruled, and with this we concur.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ullman v. Coppard, 246 F. 124, 158 C.C.A. 350, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1333 (5th Cir. 1917).
246 F. 124 (Ullman v. Coppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Katchen v. Landy
382 U.S. 323 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Feiring v. Gano
168 P.2d 901 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1946)
Seemann v. National Bank of Commerce of Houston
112 F.2d 378 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)
Johnson v. Wilson
18 F. Supp. 927 (D. Nevada, 1937)
Lewith v. Irving Trust Co.
67 F.2d 855 (Second Circuit, 1933)
Metz v. Knobel
21 F.2d 317 (Second Circuit, 1927)
In re J. H. Small Shoe Co.
5 F.2d 956 (Second Circuit, 1925)
Woods v. Rapoport
222 P. 220 (Washington Supreme Court, 1924)
Lincoln v. People's Nat. Bank
260 F. 422 (E.D. Michigan, 1919)