Ullendorff v. Graham

92 So. 624, 83 Fla. 628
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 19, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 92 So. 624 (Ullendorff v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ullendorff v. Graham, 92 So. 624, 83 Fla. 628 (Fla. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.-

-The bill of complaint herein sufficiently appears in Ullendorff v. Graham, 80 Fla. 845, 87 South. [629]*629Rep. 50, where an order sustaining a demurrer and dismissing the bill was reversed.

On demand answers were filed and on testimony taken the chancellor dismissed the bill of complaint. The complainant appealed.

The defendant vendors sought to show the conveyance executed by them was not intended as a completed escrow and that Ullendorff knew the vendors contemplated a conveyance to others.

The evidence sustains the allegations of the bill of complaint as to the execution of a deed of conveyance to Ullendorff and placing it in escrow and as to the receipt of a part of the purchase by the vendors and a compliance by the purchaser with the terms of the escrow, no controlling equities as against Ullendorff appearing.

Reversed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ullendorff v. Graham
87 So. 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 624, 83 Fla. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ullendorff-v-graham-fla-1922.