Ulises Martinez v. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ulises Martinez v. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC

DecidedJanuary 23, 2024

Docket14-23-00773-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Ulises Martinez v. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC (Ulises Martinez v. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ulises Martinez v. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 23, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00773-CV

ULISES MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

PCA ACQUISITIONS V, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-38627

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed October 5, 2023. The notice of appeal was filed October 20, 2023. To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs). Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs). Moreover, no clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant had not paid for the record, and there is otherwise no indication appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record.

On November 6, 2023, appellant was instructed to pay the appellate filing fee on or before November 16, 2023 or the appeal would be subject to dismissal without further notice. In addition, on December 5, 2023, notification was transmitted to appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless, within fifteen days, appellant made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant did not provide any response to any of those notices.

On December 28, 2023, appellant was ordered to pay the filing fee and demonstrate he had made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before January 8, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with either of those requirements would leave the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution.

Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee, he has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record, nor has he otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 23, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00773-CV

ULISES MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

PCA ACQUISITIONS V, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021-38627

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed October 5, 2023. The notice of appeal was filed October 20, 2023. To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs). Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs). Moreover, no clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant had not paid for the record, and there is otherwise no indication appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record.

On November 6, 2023, appellant was instructed to pay the appellate filing fee on or before November 16, 2023 or the appeal would be subject to dismissal without further notice. In addition, on December 5, 2023, notification was transmitted to appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless, within fifteen days, appellant made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant did not provide any response to any of those notices.

On December 28, 2023, appellant was ordered to pay the filing fee and demonstrate he had made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before January 8, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with either of those requirements would leave the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution.

Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee, he has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record, nor has he otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ulises Martinez v. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ulises-martinez-v-pca-acquisitions-v-llc-texapp-2024.