Ulesoo v. Oregon Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ulesoo v. Oregon Realty

204 A.D.2d 305, 614 N.Y.S.2d 140

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 2, 1994·Published

Opinion

In an action, to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated May 7, 1992, as denied that branch of [306]*306their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, there are questions of fact which must be determined at trial. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion for summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated May 7, 1992, as denied that branch of [306]*306their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, there are questions of fact which must be determined at trial. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion for summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Ulesoo v. Oregon Realty, 204 A.D.2d 305, 614 N.Y.S.2d 140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

204 A.D.2d 305 (Ulesoo v. Oregon Realty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.