Ulesoo v. Oregon Realty
This text of 204 A.D.2d 305 (Ulesoo v. Oregon Realty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated May 7, 1992, as denied that branch of [306]*306their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, there are questions of fact which must be determined at trial. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion for summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 305, 614 N.Y.S.2d 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ulesoo-v-oregon-realty-nyappdiv-1994.