Uleanya, Okezie Nnaemeka
This text of Uleanya, Okezie Nnaemeka (Uleanya, Okezie Nnaemeka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,522-01
EX PARTE OKEZIE ULEANYA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1191515-A IN THE 337TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to arson and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. Applicant
filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that plea was involuntary because trial counsel failed to inform him of
the immigration consequences of his plea. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him
to relief. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010); Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte
Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The
trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, 2
the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. It appears Applicant is represented by
counsel. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint
counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged
deficient performance. The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant was removed
from the country while this application has been pending. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: April 28, 2021
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uleanya, Okezie Nnaemeka, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uleanya-okezie-nnaemeka-texcrimapp-2021.