Uldric v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Uldric v. State

128 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 683

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 13, 1930

Docket5 Div. 806.

StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 926 (Uldric v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uldric v. State, 128 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 683 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The conviction of this appellant in the court below was for the offense of violating the prohibition law and the trial was had, before a jury, upon an indictment preferred by the grand jury. The jury assessed a fine of $50, the costs of the case amounted to $160.-60, and, the defendant having failed to pay the fine and cost or to confess judgment therefor, the court sentenced him to hard labor for 20 days to pay the fine, 221 days to pay the cost, and also to 6 months’ hard labor added by the court. From the judgment of conviction, this appeal was taken. The appeal here 'is rested upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. The record is regular and without error; therefore the judgment of conviction appealed from must sfand affinned.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The conviction of this appellant in the court below was for the offense of violating the prohibition law and the trial was had, before a jury, upon an indictment preferred by the grand jury. The jury assessed a fine of $50, the costs of the case amounted to $160.-60, and, the defendant having failed to pay the fine and cost or to confess judgment therefor, the court sentenced him to hard labor for 20 days to pay the fine, 221 days to pay the cost, and also to 6 months’ hard labor added by the court. From the judgment of conviction, this appeal was taken. The appeal here 'is rested upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. The record is regular and without error; therefore the judgment of conviction appealed from must sfand affinned.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uldric-v-state-alactapp-1930.