Ulbricht v. Ulbricht

35 N.Y.S. 324, 89 Hun 479, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 479, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 723
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 1895·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought for a divorce, on the ground of adultery. The defendant was entitled, as matter of right, to a trial by jury of the issue of adultery, and she could only be deprived of that right in the manner provided for by the Code. She was not obligated to move the court for the purpose of framing the issues in order that they might be put in position to be tried by a jury. This was the plaintiff’s duty, if he desired to have his ac[325]*325tian tried; and the fact that the defendant undertook that duty at a late day, as the plaintiff claims, is no reason for depriving her of the order which had been made in her favor for alimony and counsel fees. If there was any loches, it was the loches of the plaintiff, in not prosecuting his action diligently, and getting it into a condition of readiness for trial. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ulbricht v. Ulbricht, 35 N.Y.S. 324, 89 Hun 479, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 479, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 723 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

35 N.Y.S. 324 (Ulbricht v. Ulbricht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Cohen
160 A.D. 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Jacob v. Schiff
149 N.Y.S. 273 (New York Supreme Court, 1913)
Herb v. Metropolitan Hospital & Dispensary
80 A.D. 145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)